Wednesday, 19 August 2015

The American Mastodon

I will begin my research by looking at the American Mastodon, a distant relative on the elephant and the mammoth which took a widespread residency in North America around 125,000 years ago. The mammal went extinct around 10,000 years ago, and while it is believed that human influence and hunting would have been the final straw for the extinction of the animal, the change in climate was hugely influential on dwindling down the population years earlier (Zazula et al., 2014).

The American Mastodon was a grazer which mainly fed off woody plants in coniferous and mixed woodlands. According to the findings of the Mastodons bones in North America, they lived in high latitudes (Zazula et al., 2014). Few remains are found in arctic/ sub-arctic regions, however it is highly likely that they lived at very high latitudes during interglacial periods when the temperature was warmer and the areas were covered in woodlands. It coexisted with the mammoth, however they filled different niches and were not fighting for the same resources, and therefore their decline in numbers was not due to competition (Zazula et al., 2014).

Until a recent article published in Proceedings of National Academy of Science in 2014, it was believed that humans were responsible for the extinction of the species, however when scientists re-dated the mastodon teeth, they dated back to millennia’s before humans were even close to crossing over to America from Eurasia. Therefore if there were no predators which could match the height and weight of the Mastodon, or a predator that would match the skill set of a human, then it comes down to the quick changes in climatic conditions which lead to the decline in numbers of Mastodons (Zazula et al., 2014).

 Artist interpretation of the American Mastodon by Stephen Moore


The most recent theory is that the Mastodons decline was due to the species not being able to adapt to the cooler temperatures from the Pliocene to the Pleistocene. During the warmer periods of the Pliocene, the Mastodon would migrate north in latitudes to where boreal forests were developing as opposed to the tundra landscape there is today. The Mastodons could not migrate south fast enough to avoid to cooler temperatures of the Pleistocene and the ice caps that developed with the glacial period, and could not adapt quick enough to live in the cooler temperatures (Zazula,  et al., 2014).
The glacial period in the Pleistocene was a result of the closing of the panama corridor, which had an effect on the thermohaline circulations and thus contributed to a reorganisation of the atmosphere as a result of change in the geology affecting the ocean currents. The generation of more upwelling along coasts meant enhanced productivity, however this also resulted in CO2 being drawn into the ocean system and consequently furthering the cool down affect. Throughout the rest of the Pliocene period there were warming and cooling events, leaving us humans to live in an interglacial period today (Martínez-Botí, et al., 2015).

The recent ice age that we have come out of had average temperatures of 5-10C colder than today (Herring, 2012). The Pliocene epoch before that had temperatures relatively similar to today’s, meaning that the change between the two epochs was fairly dramatic. However over the next 100 years it is predicted that the climate could increase by 1.1 to 5.4°C (Robinson, Dowsett, & Chandler, 2008). The temperature change over the next 100 years is half of the total change between two epochs – which lasted hundreds of thousands of years. That means that over the course of the next few hundred years our planet will undergo extreme changes which will affect agriculture, water availability and many other necessities to human life. The Mastodons declined significantly in numbers due to the extreme change in climate and their inability to adapt. The optimist side of this is that humans as a species have adapted from cooler temperatures to warmer temperatures during their evolution throughout the Pleistocene epoch. However it would be a matter of determining what temperature humans are capable of adapting to in terms of a further temperature increase, and could agriculture adapt simultaneously.



                                         
                          

References

Herring, D. (2012, March 5). Climate Change: Global Temperature Projections. Retrieved from Climate: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature-projections
Martínez-Botí, M., Foster, G., Chalk, T., Rohling, E., Sexton, P., Lunt, D., . . . Schmidt, D. (2015). Plio-Pleistocene climate sensitivity evaluated using high-resolution CO2 records. Nature, 49-54.
Robinson, M., Dowsett, H., & Chandler, M. (2008). Pliocene Role in Assessing. EOS, 501-502.

Zazula, G., D. E. MacPhee, R., Metcalfe, J., Reyes, A. V., & Brock, F. (2014). American mastodon extirpation in the Arctic and Subarctic predates human colonization and terminal Pleistocene climate change. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, 18460–18465.

Overview

Everybody knows that at the rate humans are going, our race will not survive without a dramatic turn of events. We are due to reach carrying capacity in the next 100 years, and the driving forces behind the earth are starting to dysfunction at a rate that will take a huge toll on agriculture systems and water availability. What will kill us first? Will it be overpopulation which will lead to a shortage of resources and put the human race below ground, or will humans be able to keep up with the fast pace changes of the environment?


Over the course of the next few weeks, I will be researching the extinction of specific species which have resulted from changes in global cycles. The aim of this research is to see if there are any common links between the way that previous species have become extinct and humans, and to analyse whether humans could be susceptible to the same events. The species that I will talk about won’t have become extinct as a direct result of humans (eg. Poaching, hunting), however some may be an indirect result of human actions (eg. climate change). I don’t expect to find answers of course, however I do believe it will be interesting to investigate how the changes amongst earth systems have led to the extinction of some, and whether or not humans could follow a similar path.